logo

home nav

 
 

 

Nine Reasons to Pay A Pro Editor

to Review Documents for Publication

Part 1: Five Ways Your Computer Fails You

 

The five statements that follow point out how spell-check, grammar-check, and style-check tools fail to catch some errors in spelling, grammar, and style. It is possible that the word-processing program you use catches one or more of the errors mentioned here. Even so, these five statements with examples indicate how no software developer can replace the expertise of a pro editor. That expertise has proven invaluable to innumerable writers, ensuring that their writing fulfils its potential.

Review these and decide whether your writing should proceed toward publication without the input of a professional editor. 

1. Spell-check does not recognize the parts of speech.

  • Practice and advice are nouns. Practise and advise are verbs.
  • Center can be a noun or a verb. Centre is only a noun.

All four words are correctly spelled and pass through spell-check. Yet, spell-check cannot tell you when the word you use is the wrong part of speech in any particular sentence.

 2. Grammar-check always discourages the passive voice, though it exists for a reason.

  • Passive: The papers were shipped by courier yesterday at five o’clock.
  • Active: I shipped the papers by courier yesterday at five o’clock

 

The sentence with the passive verb emphasizes the papers being shipped. The sentence with the active verb emphasizes the speaker’s responsibility for the shipping. One could serve your particular context better than the other. Yet, by always discouraging the passive voice, grammar-check does not support an informed choice.

 

3. Style-check cannot help you with the logic of your sentences.

  • Everywhere we looked, there were happy people – even where we couldn’t see them.
  • This sandwich is big, and Tina is small, so we should leave now.

Style-check passes over some sentences flawed in ways that make readers stumble, including sentences with logical flaws, as in these examples.

 

4. Grammar-check cannot help you with some examples of subject-verb agreement.

  • None of those shovels is mine.
  • Her family has always been supportive.

None is a contraction of not and one. When none is the subject of a sentence or clause, use singular verbs, as with one. Similarly, family, like crowd, audience, and other collective nouns, is singular and goes with singular verbs.

 

5. Spell-check cannot tell you when you use the wrong word.

  • Lisa drove the car right into the post.
  • Lisa drove the car right into the past.

If you intend to type post, but enter past, your computer won’t notice the error. Till (verb: to turn soil; noun: the moving part of a cash register that contains cash) and til (adverb: a contraction of until) also evade spell-check when misused. Likewise, form often remains unnoticed when from is the correct word.

Many contextually-incorrect words could go out to your readers after passing through spell-check, grammar-check and/or style-check tools. In fact, the internal dictionary in some software does not recognize til at all. It allows only till, even when the contraction from until is the correct word.

 

Part 2: Four Ways Friends and Colleagues Can Lead You Astray

 

The four statements that follow show how editorial review by friends and colleagues generally introduces risk to the success of any document. Though a friend, family member, colleague, or other person might provide immensely helpful input toward the success of a document, it also happens that such people become unhelpful meddlers despite the best intentions or qualifications. Even if you consider yourself able to avoid these pitfalls, do not regard the editorial contributions of a friend or colleague as eliminating the value of a professional editor. 

6. Many editors edit simply to please themselves.

  • Friends and colleagues playing the role of editor often differ from the writer regarding grammar, punctuation, capitalization, spelling, style, or level of detail. This can result in their attempting to correct a document by revising it to their own standards, which might not be correct, consistent, or better than the writer’s standards.

7. Friends and colleagues are often not sure how to improve a document for its intended readers.

  • The value of an editor comes from improving the reader’s experience of the writer’s work. This requires the editor to know who the intended readers are, what they expect, and how to fulfil their expectations. Thus, a book on photography for children, for example, might benefit from a photographer’s input on technical matters only.

8. Subject-matter experts can help with facts while obstructing effectiveness in other ways.

  • Subject-matter experts often unknowingly bring their own agenda to editorial revision. This could include their meddling in the facts and introducing their own style biases. This can render a document as an imbalanced patchwork of facts and views. Fixing this could take much time and effort, again leaving you in need of a good editor.

9. Friends and colleagues often introduce distortions when intending to improve a document.

  • Regardless of what qualifies a friend or colleague to edit a document, it is common for the editorial role to bring out unhelpful co-authorship. For example, if he or she considers the two topics inseparably linked, the editor might consider it necessary to include discussion of topic Y because the document mentions topic X. Though there could be merit in this, it might take the document beyond the interest or beyond the comprehension of the intended readers. Otherwise, it could make the document too lengthy or out of scope.

what to do

First, focus on getting the contents of your documents correct and complete. Then, pay a pro editor for thorough editing. A professional editor can make and suggest revisions more comprehensively, more constructively, and more contextually appropriate than software tools - even supplemented by a friend or colleague. Once you have integrated the editor’s input, then pay for professional proofing so that your documents may provide higher value to you and your readers.

- Glenn R Harrington, Articulate Consultants Inc.

 

Click on the pilot
for the site map + links to more articles.